260 (Thousands) thanks

Percona live is over, and we finally get some feedback about our presentations.

Initially I had 3 presentations to give:

Comparing High Available Solutions With Percona XtraDB Cluster and Percona Server With Group Replication.
Comparing Hash Join solution, the good, the bad and the worse. The New version 2021.
Boosting MySQL NDB cluster & MySQL Innodb Cluster with PrxySQL V2

But when I saw we were having a lot of great submissions, I decided that it would be better for the conference and for Percona to drop 2 of them and leave some free slots for others.

That has always been my line of conduct, I do not think we should have speakers with multiple talks unless exceptions. I know in the past I had been presenting multiple times, but that is why I am stating this now, more and more.

Anyhow, the remaining talk was Comparing High Available Solutions With Percona XtraDB Cluster and Percona Server With Group Replication. Which is a high level discussion about High Availability and the two main solutions Percona provides for it.

The presentation was previously recorded and played during the event. This allowed me to interact during the presentation much more than if I had to do it live. thankyou

I thought we had a good level of interactions and discussion which is always a good sign, but when we finally got the feedback I discovered my session had 260 attendees.

Now, I am still trying to get more info (wondering why it is so difficult to get) but from what I discovered so far, it was in the first three most attended.

Given that I want to THANK YOU to all who have been there. I want to say one million times THANK YOU to all the ones who had also interacted during the presentation.

The reason to be for a speaker is to have not only people in the room, but people who interact because they are interested.
I like to think this is the result of years of honest and unbias blogging and speaking. So once more thank you!

Percona had not publish it yet on the official site, I am sharing it from youtube. In case you are still interested to view it, unfortunately the chat interaction is not there, given this was my original recording I had passed for the conference, but better than nothing right?

And now few comments about the conference.

In general it was a good conference, I think we had a decent mix of technical and less technical content. I really enjoyed the key notes with Amanda Brock and after Luis Villa. I can be more in alignment with one instead of the other, but the topic and the side discussion in the chat was great.

About trying to follow the tracks and trying to attend the most interesting speeches (for me), I have to say I was a bit disappointed.

In my article here I was giving an indication of which presentations I was going to attend or when in conflict I was expecting to be able to see the recording.

But there had been some unexpected inconveniences.

The first one, positive, was that I wanted to attend more talks than the ones in the list. The second one, negative, was that the conference organization did not provide the recording after the speech. Actually as mentioned above most of them are still not published.

Now, while I understand that in case of LIVE talk, you may need some time to put them up, I do not get why we were not publishing the recording, as they were, after the official slot was over. Any additional refining or editing could have been done later, but in the meantime people would have been able to get better service and attend more.

Point was that as soon as I discovered it was not possible to watch the recording after the presentation, I started to keep on at least two screens, and record what I cannot focus on to be able to watch it later. Very annoying and disappointing. But hey space for improvement right? Next online event can be better.

Another thing I liked was the platform used for the conference, easy, clean and allowed a lot of “offline” sharing. Yes, sometimes we had to reload the page to have the presentation running, but that was not a big deal.

I want to mention again the great work done by the Percona marketing team in making this event a great success. All of them, but special mention is for Bronwyn Campbell and Valentina Lago, without them Percona live 2021 would NOT be what it was.

Finally, while all of us around the globe HOPE to be able to attend the next conference in person, I strongly doubt this will be possible. We MUST keep in mind conferences as Percona Live is a global event. That will make it very unlikely to have people attending in person soon. Obviously the option is to limit it to a regional event, which for me will mean to diminish its relevance in a very impactful way. I miss meeting in person, but I would prefer to have the conference online, if that means I will miss a huge part of the speakers and their content!

And I may be pessimistic, but I doubt we will be in a safe position before the next event.

Well that is all for now, but stay tuned… because the two missed presentations are coming ;)

To all THANK YOU two hundred sixty thousand times once more.

thankyou

Percona Live 2021 - my agenda picks

Well, we are almost there.

Percona Live 2021 is just around the corner and this year comes with a very “dense” agenda. PL2021 Speaker cards Marco Tusa

From my side I am giving a speech that is a high-level comparison between PXC and PS with group replication as highly available solutions.

It is a bit new for me to be at such high level, given I prefer to dig into technical, but I also think it was worth to stop and have the chance better understand what gives us what.

Anyhow this blog is not about that.

Given, as said, this year we will have a very “dense” schedule, I initially look at it and get scared.

“Too much stuff!”, that was my initial thought. Then I take a breath, reserve a couple of hours of my personal time, and start to dig-in.

In general, I have to say that thanks to the fact we are having an online event with registered speech it would be easier to attend multiple tracks also when conflicting.

What I did, I start to prune the agenda from the topics I am less interested, like marketing, or from source we know are predicating right and acting in totally different way. Then I navigate the speeches reading abstracts, reading about the speaker (if I was not familiar with), and start to compile my list.

Once done I realized it was a quite good and solid track, and possible worthy to share.

Spoiler alert, I love fantasy, so you may end up in attending one or two speech which will talk about fables, but you know we always need to have some fun time.

Before sharing the schedule, I want to mention that without the incredible work done by Bronwyn Campbell (Global Events Manager in Percona) and Valentina Lago (Global Events Coordinator) Percona Live would not exists. Given that we should thanks them for the HUGE effort done to realize this incredible event.

And now my list, I have left some holes here and there, where there was nothing interesting for me, to attend the speeches that are in conflict.

The link to the agenda: https://perconaliveonline.sched.com/

Hope you will find it useful:

All times are in EDT

May 12
6:30
Percona Server for MySQL in the Enterprise - Dimitri Vanoverbeke
Building and Scaling a Robust Zero-Code Data Pipeline With Open Source Technologies - Paul Brebner

8:00
Projections in ClickHouse - Amos Bird
Revertible, Recoverable Schema Migrations in Vitess - Shlomi Noach

8:30
Creating MySQL User-Defined Functions in C++ Has Never Been Easier - Yura Sorokin
ClickHouse 2021: New Features and Roadmap - Alexey Milovidov

9:00
The Essentials of Search - Kyle Davis

11:00
Organize the Migration of a Hundred Database Clusters to the Cloud - Maxime Fouilleul

13:00
Sharding All The Way Down: Building Fast and Highly Concurrent Databases on Modern Hardware - Avishai Ish-Shalom

13:30
Creating Chaos in Databases - Vadim Tkachenko

14:00
The Top 5 Things You Should Know About Databases on Kubernetes vs VMs - Marco Nicosia - Rachel Heaton - Adam Berlin

15:00
ARM Power! Comparing MySQL x86 vs ARM Performance - Vinicius. Grippa

16:00
Debug a Kubernetes Operator - Philipp Krenn
Kubernetes-on-Rails?! KateSQL: A Shopify-Scale Cloud-Hosted MySQL Platform - Jeremy Cole - Akshay Suryawanshi

17:30
MyRocks - The 30,000 Foot View - Mike Benshoof
Open Source DBaaS with PMM - Steve Hoffman

May 13
7:00
Hybrid TP/AP With MySQL and ClickHouse - Stig Bakken
OSINT - Do You Really Know What Data You're Leaking? - David Busby
How Machine Learning Inside Databases Solves Significant Data-Science Challenges - Jorge Torres - Patricio Cerda-Mardini

7:30
Setup and manage alerts for databases with Integrated alerting in Percona Monitoring and Management - Peter Boros - Zoriana Stefanyshyn

8:30
Test Applications' Storage Stability by Injecting Storage Errors - Keao Yang

9:00
Everything a DBA Should Know About Kubernetes - Janos Pasztor

9:30
MySQL Shell for DBAs - Frédéric Descamps

10:00
How to Develop BPF Tools with libbpf + BPF CO-RE - Wenbo Zhang

10:30
Don’t Feed Me Dog Food and Call it a 5 Star Meal. How the Open Source Landscape is Being Hijacked. - Matt Yonkovit

11:00
Brand New Development Announced at PL - Johannes Schlüter - Kenny Gryp
Scaling Out Distributed Storage Fabric with RocksDB - Yasaswi Kishore - Sandeep Madanala

13:00
Successfully Run Your MySQL NDB Cluster in Kubernetes - Tiago Alves

14:00
GraphQL as Analytical Language for Data Warehouses - Aleksey Studnev

Inconsistent voting in PXC

AKA Cluster Error Voting

What is Cluster Error Voting (CEV)?

“Cluster Error Voting is a new feature implemented by Alexey Yurchenko, and it is a protocol for nodes to decide how the cluster will react to problems in replication. When one or several nodes have an issue to apply an incoming transaction(s) (e.g. suspected inconsistency), this new feature helps. In a 5-node cluster, if 2-nodes fail to apply the transaction, they get removed and a DBA can go in to fix what went wrong so that the nodes can rejoin the cluster. (Seppo Jaakola)”

This feature was ported to Percona PXC in version 8.0.21, and as indicated above, it is about increasing the resilience of the cluster especially when TWO nodes fail to operate and may drop from the cluster abruptly. The protocol is activated in a cluster with any number of nodes.

Before CEV if a node has a problem/error during a transaction, the node having the issue would just report the error in his own log and exit the cluster:

2021-04-23T15:18:38.568903Z 11 [ERROR] [MY-010584] [Repl] Slave SQL: Could not execute Write_rows event on table test.test_voting; Duplicate entry '21' for key 'test_voting.PRIMARY', Error_code: 1062; handler error HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY; the event's master log FIRST, end_log_pos 0, Error_code: MY-001062
2021-04-23T15:18:38.568976Z 11 [Warning] [MY-000000] [WSREP] Event 3 Write_rows apply failed: 121, seqno 16
2021-04-23T15:18:38.569717Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Failed to apply write set: gtid: 224fddf7-a43b-11eb-84d5-2ebf2df70610:16 server_id: d7ae67e4-a43c-11eb-861f-8fbcf4f1cbb8 client_id: 40 trx_id: 115 flags: 3
2021-04-23T15:18:38.575439Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Closing send monitor...
2021-04-23T15:18:38.575578Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Closed send monitor.
2021-04-23T15:18:38.575647Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: terminating thread
2021-04-23T15:18:38.575737Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: joining thread
2021-04-23T15:18:38.576132Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: closing backend
2021-04-23T15:18:38.577954Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view (view_id(NON_PRIM,3206d174,5)
memb {
	727c277a,1
	}
joined {
	}
left {
	}
partitioned {
	3206d174,1
	d7ae67e4,1
	}
)
2021-04-23T15:18:38.578109Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] PC protocol downgrade 1 -> 0
2021-04-23T15:18:38.578158Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view ((empty))
2021-04-23T15:18:38.578640Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: closed
2021-04-23T15:18:38.578747Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] New COMPONENT: primary = no, bootstrap = no, my_idx = 0, memb_num = 1

While the other nodes, will “just” report the node as out of the view:

2021-04-23T15:18:38.561402Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] forgetting 727c277a (tcp://10.0.0.23:4567)
2021-04-23T15:18:38.562751Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Node 3206d174 state primary
2021-04-23T15:18:38.570411Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view (view_id(PRIM,3206d174,6)
memb {
	3206d174,1
	d7ae67e4,1
	}
joined {
	}
left {
	}
partitioned {
	727c277a,1
	}
)
2021-04-23T15:18:38.570679Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Save the discovered primary-component to disk
2021-04-23T15:18:38.574592Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] forgetting 727c277a (tcp://10.0.0.23:4567)
2021-04-23T15:18:38.574716Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] New COMPONENT: primary = yes, bootstrap = no, my_idx = 1, memb_num = 2
2021-04-23

With CEV we have a different process. Let us review it with images first.

Let us start with a cluster based on:

3 Nodes where only one works as Primary.

Primary writes and as expected writestes are distributed on all nodes.

insert into test_voting values(null,REVERSE(UUID()), NOW()); <-- Few times

DC1-1(root@localhost) [test]>select * from test_voting;
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
| id | what                                 | when                |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
|  3 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6d135601 | 2021-04-24 14:43:34 |
|  6 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-7eb60711 | 2021-04-24 14:43:36 |
|  9 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6861c221 | 2021-04-24 14:43:37 |
| 12 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-d43f0031 | 2021-04-24 14:43:38 |
| 15 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-53891c31 | 2021-04-24 14:43:39 |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

Some inexperienced DBA does manual operation on a secondary using the very unsafe feature wsrep_on.

And then by mistake or because he did not understand what he is doing:

insert into test_voting values(17,REVERSE(UUID()), NOW()); <-- with few different ids

At the end of the operation the Secondary node will have:

DC1-2(root@localhost) [test]>select * from test_voting;
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
| id | what                                 | when                |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
|  3 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6d135601 | 2021-04-24 14:43:34 |
|  6 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-7eb60711 | 2021-04-24 14:43:36 |
|  9 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6861c221 | 2021-04-24 14:43:37 |
| 12 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-d43f0031 | 2021-04-24 14:43:38 |
| 15 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-53891c31 | 2021-04-24 14:43:39 |
| 16 | 05de43720080-a39a-be11-405a-82715600 | 2021-04-24 14:50:17 |
| 17 | 05de43720080-a39a-be11-405a-f9d62e22 | 2021-04-24 14:51:14 |
| 18 | 05de43720080-a39a-be11-405a-f5624662 | 2021-04-24 14:51:20 |
| 19 | 05de43720080-a39a-be11-405a-cd8cd640 | 2021-04-24 14:50:23 |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+

Which of course is not in line with the rest of the cluster, that still has the previous data.

Then our guy put the node back:

At this point the Primary does another insert in that table and:

Houston we have a problem!

The secondary node already has the entry with that ID and cannot perform the insert:

2021-04-24T13:52:51.930184Z 12 [ERROR] [MY-010584] [Repl] Slave SQL: Could not execute Write_rows event on table test.test_voting; Duplicate entry '18' for key 'test_voting.PRIMARY', Error_code: 1062; handler error HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY; the event's master log FIRST, end_log_pos 0, Error_code: MY-001062
2021-04-24T13:52:51.930295Z 12 [Warning] [MY-000000] [WSREP] Event 3 Write_rows apply failed: 121, seqno 4928120

But instead of exit from the cluster it will raise a verification through voting:

2021-04-24T13:52:51.932774Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Member 0(node2) initiates vote on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120,878ded7898c83a72:  Duplicate entry '18' for key 'test_voting.PRIMARY', Error_code: 1062;
2021-04-24T13:52:51.932888Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Votes over ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120:
   878ded7898c83a72:   1/3
Waiting for more votes.
2021-04-24T13:52:51.936525Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Member 1(node3) responds to vote on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120,0000000000000000: Success
2021-04-24T13:52:51.936626Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Votes over ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120:
   0000000000000000:   1/3
   878ded7898c83a72:   1/3
Waiting for more votes.
2021-04-24T13:52:52.003615Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Member 2(node1) responds to vote on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120,0000000000000000: Success
2021-04-24T13:52:52.003722Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Votes over ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120:
   0000000000000000:   2/3
   878ded7898c83a72:   1/3
Winner: 0000000000000000

As you can see each node inform the cluster about the success or failure of the operation, the majority wins.

Once the majority had identified the operation was legit, as such, the node that ask for the voting will need to get out from the cluster:

2021-04-24T13:52:52.038510Z 12 [ERROR] [MY-000000] [Galera] Inconsistency detected: Inconsistent by consensus on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120
	 at galera/src/replicator_smm.cpp:process_apply_error():1433
2021-04-24T13:52:52.062666Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Closing send monitor...
2021-04-24T13:52:52.062750Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Closed send monitor.
2021-04-24T13:52:52.062796Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: terminating thread
2021-04-24T13:52:52.062880Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: joining thread
2021-04-24T13:52:52.063372Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: closing backend
2021-04-24T13:52:52.085853Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view (view_id(NON_PRIM,65a111c6-bb0f,23)
memb {
	65a111c6-bb0f,2
	}
joined {
	}
left {
	}
partitioned {
	aae38617-8dd5,2
	dc4eaa39-b39a,2
	}
)
2021-04-24T13:52:52.086241Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] PC protocol downgrade 1 -> 0
2021-04-24T13:52:52.086391Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view ((empty))
2021-04-24T13:52:52.150106Z 12 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] gcomm: closed
2021-04-24T13:52:52.150340Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] New COMPONENT: primary = no, bootstrap = no, my_idx = 0, memb_num = 1

It is also nice to notice that now we have a decent level of information about what happened also in the other nodes, the log below is from the Primary:

2021-04-24T13:52:51.932829Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Member 0(node2) initiates vote on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120,878ded7898c83a72:  Duplicate entry '18' for key 'test_voting.PRIMARY', Error_code: 1062;
2021-04-24T13:52:51.978123Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Votes over ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120:
…<snip>
2021-04-24T13:52:51.981647Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Votes over ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120:
   0000000000000000:   2/3
   878ded7898c83a72:   1/3
Winner: 0000000000000000
2021-04-24T13:52:51.981887Z 11 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Vote 0 (success) on ab5deb8e-389d-11eb-b1c0-36eca47bacf0:4928120 is consistent with group. Continue.
2021-04-24T13:52:52.064685Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] declaring aae38617-8dd5 at tcp://10.0.0.31:4567 stable
2021-04-24T13:52:52.064885Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] forgetting 65a111c6-bb0f (tcp://10.0.0.21:4567)
2021-04-24T13:52:52.066916Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Node aae38617-8dd5 state primary
2021-04-24T13:52:52.071577Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Current view of cluster as seen by this node
view (view_id(PRIM,aae38617-8dd5,24)
memb {
	aae38617-8dd5,2
	dc4eaa39-b39a,2
	}
joined {
	}
left {
	}
partitioned {
	65a111c6-bb0f,2
	}
)
2021-04-24T13:52:52.071683Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] Save the discovered primary-component to disk
2021-04-24T13:52:52.075293Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] forgetting 65a111c6-bb0f (tcp://10.0.0.21:4567)
2021-04-24T13:52:52.075419Z 0 [Note] [MY-000000] [Galera] New COMPONENT: primary = yes, bootstrap = no, my_idx = 1, memb_num = 2

At this point a DBA can start to investigate and manually fix the inconsistency and have the node rejoin the cluster. In the meanwhile the rest of the cluster continue to operate:

+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
| id | what                                 | when                |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+
|  3 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6d135601 | 2021-04-24 14:43:34 |
|  6 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-7eb60711 | 2021-04-24 14:43:36 |
|  9 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-6861c221 | 2021-04-24 14:43:37 |
| 12 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-d43f0031 | 2021-04-24 14:43:38 |
| 15 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-305a-53891c31 | 2021-04-24 14:43:39 |
| 18 | 05de43720080-938a-be11-405a-d02c7bc5 | 2021-04-24 14:52:51 |
+----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+

Conclusion

Cluster Error Voting (CEV), is a nice feature to have. It helps to understand better what goes wrong and it increases the stability of the cluster, that with the voting has a better way to manage the node expulsion.

Another aspect is the visibility, never underestimate the fact an information is available also on other nodes. Having it available on multiple nodes may help investigations in case the log on the failing node gets lost (for any reasons).

We still do not have active tuple certification, but is a good step, especially given the history we have seen of data drift in PXC/Galera in these 12 years of utilization.

My LAST comment, is that while I agree WSREP_ON can be a very powerful tool in the hands of experts as indicated in my colleague blog https://www.percona.com/blog/2019/03/25/how-to-perform-compatible-schema-changes-in-percona-xtradb-cluster-advanced-alternative/ . That option remains DANGEROUS, and you should never use it UNLESS your name is Przemysław Malkowski and you really know what you are doing.

Great MySQL to everybody!

References

https://www.percona.com/doc/percona-xtradb-cluster/8.0/release-notes/Percona-XtraDB-Cluster-8.0.21-12.1.html

https://youtu.be/LbaCyr9Soco

Sidebar

Main Menu Mobile